<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments on A better technique to stop spam?</title>
    <link>http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam</link>
    <description>Neil Ang Comment Feed</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>Symphony (build 1701)</generator>
    <item>
      <title>tinviet commented on A better technique to stop spam?</title>
      <link>http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam/#comment-104</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam/#comment-104</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I'm looking for similar script but detect the human action ( no use captcha) like moving of mouse + type speed + certain amount of char typed in ,, then affter testing will be alow to post or rederect user to other url instead of posting urls
any one have idea&lt;/p&gt;
					     &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="What are you, chicken?!" href="http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam/#comment"&gt;Post a reply&lt;/a&gt; (I dare you!)&lt;/p&gt;
					   </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Neil commented on A better technique to stop spam?</title>
      <link>http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam/#comment-99</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:21:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam/#comment-99</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;@John There is no method that is 100%, even captcha's can be bypassed by some bots. My experience with this technique has been very positive. The solution has been working effectively for me since Janurary this year, and only requires visitors to use a modern web browser to prove that they are human.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, in the future spambots may become more intelligent and start processing JS. So when the spammers start building better bots, of course  developers everywhere will need to improve their detection methods.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you are concerned with bots bypassing this now, you can use this technique along with others (e.g. Akismet) to improve security.&lt;/p&gt;
					     &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="What are you, chicken?!" href="http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam/#comment"&gt;Post a reply&lt;/a&gt; (I dare you!)&lt;/p&gt;
					   </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John commented on A better technique to stop spam?</title>
      <link>http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam/#comment-98</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam/#comment-98</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;How long before bots/robots start executing JS code and this technique is extinct?&lt;/p&gt;
					     &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="What are you, chicken?!" href="http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam/#comment"&gt;Post a reply&lt;/a&gt; (I dare you!)&lt;/p&gt;
					   </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John R commented on A better technique to stop spam?</title>
      <link>http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam/#comment-72</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:58:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam/#comment-72</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;good post, I have seen this technique elsewhere, the idea of having a valid page for the fake submission url is a good one so users without java script will know their form submission didn't go through.&lt;/p&gt;
					     &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="What are you, chicken?!" href="http://neilang.com/entries/a-better-technique-to-stop-spam/#comment"&gt;Post a reply&lt;/a&gt; (I dare you!)&lt;/p&gt;
					   </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
